fbpx
The Number One Mistake Traders Make and How to Avoid It
The Number One Mistake Traders Make and How to Avoid It

The number one mistake traders make and how to avoid it

Volatility in financial markets has made active trading very popular, but the influx of new traders has met with mixed success.

Why is this, and how can losses be avoided?

IG forex broker examined the traits of the most successful traders – as well as the least successful. Some clear patterns emerged which separated profitable traders from those who ultimately lost money. And indeed, there was one particular mistake we saw repeated over and over again.

What is it?

If you don’t have time to read now the article register for free to the following webinar: ADVANCED A.I. “BRAIN” GIVES TRADERS MARKET PREDICTIONS.

During the LIVE TRAINING, you’ll discover:

  • An advanced suite of indicators traders of ANY experience level can use to predict market moves.
  • Actual case studies of how this kind of market forecasting has changed the lives of more than 29,000 investors
  • The KEY secret behind proper market forecasting (and why so many get this wrong)
  • How you can use this information to improve your trading results significantly.
  • And so much more…

Once again, here is the link to register for free to the webinar: ADVANCED A.I. “BRAIN” GIVES TRADERS MARKET PREDICTIONS.

So now that you registered for the webinar let’s get back to our research.

Why do most traders lose money?

The first is encouraging: traders made money most of the time, as they closed over 50% of all trades at a gain.

In other words, traders were ‘right’ more often than not. This was true across a broad range of markets.

Percentage of all trades closed out at a gain and loss across 15 top markets
Percentage of all trades closed out at a gain and loss across 15 top markets.

Figure 1. Data source: IG accounts and trades, excluding clearing accounts, money managers, and eligible contract participants.

The above chart shows over 30 million real closed trades conducted by IG clients worldwide across 15 of the most popular markets. The blue bar shows the percentage of trades which ended with a profit for the client, while the light blue bar shows the percentage of trades which ended in a loss.

For example, the EUR/USD saw an impressive 64% of all trades closed out at a gain.

But if traders were right more than half of the time, why did most lose money?

Average profit and loss per winning and losing trades across 15 top markets
Average profit and loss per winning and losing trades across 15 top markets

This chart says it all. In blue, you see the average number of points which traders earned on profitable trades. In light blue, it shows the average number of points lost in losing trades.

We can now clearly see why traders lose money despite being right more than half the time: traders lose significantly more money on losing trades than they make on their winning trades.

Let’s use the FTSE 100 as an example. Figure 1 shows us traders closed 64% of all FTSE 100 trades out at a gain, while figure 2 shows the average losing trade was worth 35 points – yet the average winner was only 15 points.

Although traders were correct nearly two-thirds of the time, they lost more than twice as much on their losing trades than earned on winning trades. A similar pattern can be observed across the entire range of popular markets.

So what could be the reason for this?

Cutting losses and letting profits run

Our data shows that traders were very good at identifying profitable trading opportunities and closed over 50% of all trades at a gain. Ultimately, though, they still lost overall as outsized losses more than offset winning trades.

Open nearly any book on trading and the advice is the same: control your losses and let your profits run. Losses are an inevitable part of trading. Identify when a trade has gone against you and close it out at as small a loss as possible. Failure to do so could see a losing trade wiping out your trading capital before you can take advantage of the next opportunity.

The flip side is equally important: if a trade is in your favour, let it run. It’s tempting to accept a ‘sure thing’ and close a trade at a small gain. But consistently doing so, while taking outsized losses, is almost certainly a losing strategy.

If the solution is so simple and advice so readily available, why is this issue so common?

The answer: human nature. As humans, we have natural tendencies which cloud our decision-making.

Let’s look at a basic thought experiment to explore this further.

Understanding decision making through winning and losing

What if you were offered a simple wager? You’re asked to guess the result of a single coin flip. Assume it’s a fair coin which is equally likely to show ‘heads’ or ‘tails’.

If you guess correctly, you’ll win $1000. Guess incorrectly, and you’ll receive nothing. Let’s call this ‘choice A’.

But to make things interesting, you’ll also be given ‘choice B’ – a sure $400 gain. Which one would you choose?

From a logical perspective, choice A makes the most sense as the mathematical ‘expected return’ is $500, which would maximise profit.

We used this formula to calculate the ‘expected return’ (probability of winning x gain) + (possibility of losing x loss) = expected return.

That means the mathematical probability of winning $500 is greater (50% x $100 = $500) than losing $0 (50% x $0 = $0).

Choice B isn’t wrong per se – with zero risks of loss you couldn’t be faulted for accepting a smaller gain. And you stand the chance of making no profit whatsoever with choice A – in effect, losing the $400 offered in choice B.

It’s no surprise that similar experiments show most will choose ‘B’. When it comes to gains, we most often become risk-averse and take a sure profit.

But what about potential losses?

Using the same coin, you’re offered the equal likelihood of a $1000 loss and $0 in ‘choice A’. ‘Choice B’ is an inevitable $400 loss. Which option would you choose?

In this instance, choice B minimises losses and appears to be the logical choice – yet similar experiments have shown that most would choose ‘A’. When it comes to losses, we become risk-seeking. Most avoid risk when it comes to gains, yet actively seek risk if it means avoiding a loss.

A hypothetical coin flip is hardly something to lose sleep over, but this natural human behaviour is problematic if it extends to real-life decision-making. And it’s this dynamic which explains the most common mistake in trading.

But how can you prevent it?

Losses hurt far more than gains give pleasure.

Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky published what has been called a ‘seminal paper in behavioural economics’, which showed that humans most often made irrational decisions when faced with potential gains and losses. Their work wasn’t specific to trading but had clear implications for our studies.

The core concept was simple yet profound: most people make economic decisions not on expected utility but on their attitudes towards winning and losing. It’s usually assumed that a rational person would make decisions purely based on maximising gains and minimising losses. Yet this is empirically false – look no further than our real trading data.

Our data suggest traders felt it was ‘good enough’ to take an average 15-point gain on winning FTSE 100 trades, yet gave up an average of 35 points on their losers.

Such a dynamic very likely helps explain why our data shows 64% of all of these FTSE 100 trades were winners – it was easy to take profits but hurt too much to take losses.

Ultimately we aim to turn a profit in our trades, but to do so, we must force ourselves to work past our natural emotions and act rationally in our trading decisions.

If the desired goal were to maximise profits and minimise losses, a $500-point gain would completely offset a $500-point loss.

Avoid the common pitfall.

You need to ensure that you treat losses and gains the same when trading, and this means following a straightforward rule: always seek a potential reward at least as large as your possible loss.

We typically refer to this as a risk vs reward ratio. If you risk losing the same number of points as you hope to gain, your risk vs reward ratio is 1-to-1 (also written 1:1). This simple rule makes it possible to lose on half of your trades and still break even.

It’s certainly possible – and in some cases advisable – to use a risk/reward ratio above 1:1. But as a bare minimum, using a 1:1 ratio is preferable.

The solution – Use AI in your tradings

Humans can only make so many calculations in their head, and most traders rely on indicators using past data. This is where A.I. comes in.

VantagePoint’s artificial intelligence processes millions of data points in seconds. Their A.I. has accurately predicted countless stock market reversals, thanks to two Intermarket analysis patents, helping traders of all experience levels finally perfect their entries and exits.

Traders using their A.I. can get in sooner for more considerable gains and get out before losing precious accumulated profits.

VantagePoint forecasts market trends, no matter the direction, 72 hours in advance with up to 87.4% accuracy (documented and third-party verified).

This is the first patented artificial intelligence software globally, available to retail investors and traders of all experience levels.

VantagePoint holds a complimentary LIVE TRAINING session online so traders of all levels can experience the artificial intelligence firsthand while the markets are open.

Graphical user interface, application Description automatically generated

VantagePoint’s team of experts wants to educate ordinary traders about using artificial intelligence as part of their trading strategy. Click here to sign up for your free live training.

Because of the high level of interest, and since its free, seats at the webinar are limited. Don’t delay.

0/5 (0 Reviews)
Have a digital marketing project that gives you headaches?
Now you can hire the Monetize.info team to do it.
Want to show your product or service to 60k readers interested in monetization?
Great! Now you can advertise on Monetize.info . We have some awesome deals.

About Stephan Monetize.info

Stephan J is the founder of Monetize.info and is making a living exclusively online since 2004. He tried and managed to make good profits on everything from Forex trading, options, website flipping, adsense, affiliate websites.His passions are cycling, fitness and he is spending a small fortune on watches and fine cigars

Leave a Reply

Pin It on Pinterest

Shares