SuperEx丨Bullish? Bearish? Decoding the U.S. Crypto Strategic Reserve

[SuperExMedia]

#Crypto #Trump #SuperEx

Over the past few days, the U.S. and President Donald Trump have once again captured global attention. From Trump’s signing of the Executive Order on the Crypto Strategic Reserve on March 7 to the White House Cryptocurrency Summit, U.S. policy has taken a dramatic shift — transforming crypto from a de facto outlawed industry into a national priority.

But what exactly is the U.S. Crypto Strategic Reserve?

In simple terms, the U.S. government has established two separate digital asset reserves:

Bitcoin Strategic Reserve:

• Comprises approximately 200,000 BTC seized through civil and criminal forfeitures.
• The government has pledged not to use taxpayer money to purchase BTC.

Digital Asset Reserve:

• Includes XRP, ADA, ETH, and SOL.
• The government will not actively purchase these assets — their sources will be donations or confiscations.

Is This a Bullish Development?

At first glance, many would instinctively say: “Of course, this is great news!”

And initially, the market reacted as expected — Bitcoin surged from $85,000 to $95,000, while XRP and SOL jumped over 15% in a single day.

However, 48 hours later, the market began to decline. The altcoins included in the reserve not only lost their gains but dropped even further.

You might ask: Why? Then, you may fall into self-doubt: Is the U.S. Crypto Strategic Reserve a bullish or bearish signal? Today, we will provide a comprehensive analysis of the U.S. Crypto Strategic Reserve and the reasons behind the market’s reaction.

Policy Essence: The “Virtual and Real” Boundary of Strategic Reserves

The executive order on cryptocurrency strategic reserves signed by Trump appears to mark a historic shift in the U.S. stance on digital assets. However, significant contradictions between its conceptual framework and practical implementation remain. The core assets of the Bitcoin strategic reserve consist of approximately 200,000 BTC acquired by the government through criminal and civil forfeitures. Meanwhile, the digital asset reserve includes tokens such as XRP, ADA, ETH, and SOL but explicitly excludes proactive purchases, relying solely on confiscations or donations. Essentially, this design embodies a “zero-cost” reserve strategy — the government neither allocates fiscal funds for accumulation nor commits to long-term holdings, instead retaining the flexibility to adjust the asset portfolio at any time.

Market Expectation Misalignment

• Short-term Bullish Expectations: Following the announcement, Bitcoin’s price surged from $85,000 to $95,000, while tokens such as XRP and SOL saw daily gains exceeding 15%. The market misinterpreted this as a dual boost of “government endorsement + capital inflow.”
• Long-term Substance Deficiency: The executive order does not address key issues such as funding sources, holding periods, or custodial mechanisms. Moreover, its implementation depends on subsequent congressional legislation, making policy uncertainty extremely high.

This contradiction led to a rapid market correction within 48 hours, with Bitcoin retreating to $87,000, and XRP, SOL, and other tokens plunging over 20%. Some cryptocurrencies even fell below their pre-announcement levels.

In simple terms: The so-called crypto strategic reserve is essentially the U.S. government “clearing inventory.” They merely transferred the BTC they already possessed from the forfeiture fund into a dedicated Bitcoin strategic reserve, essentially just renaming their holdings and giving BTC an official “status” — nothing more.

Market Response Analysis: Expectation Gap and Liquidity Trap

The policy behind the cryptocurrency strategic reserve is significantly misaligned with market expectations. Since no government funds are actually flowing into the crypto market, the initial price surge was followed by a sharp decline — a result of both expectation discrepancies and liquidity constraints.

1. Expectation Gap: Policy Falls Short of Market Hopes

Despite Trump’s high-profile announcement of a strategic reserve, the actual policy impact is far weaker than expected:

• Scale Limitation: The 200,000 BTC reserve accounts for only 0.95% of Bitcoin’s total supply. Moreover, any future expansion must follow a “budget-neutral” approach (e.g., relying on seized assets), meaning it won’t create sustained buying pressure.
• Asset Inclusion Controversy: The decision to include tokens like XRP and SOL in the reserve has sparked skepticism. The SEC previously suggested that XRP could be classified as a security, while SOL has been criticized for frequent network failures. This selection has been labeled as “favoritism” rather than a strategic decision. Several prominent figures in the crypto industry have raised concerns about the reserve and the inclusion of non-Bitcoin assets. (See tweets from Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and Castle Island founder Nic Carter.) Many experts argue that Bitcoin should be the sole asset in the reserve.

2. Liquidity Trap: A Battle of Existing Funds

The crypto market is currently in a phase where existing funds are competing rather than expanding, and the strategic reserve has failed to attract new capital:

Institutional Investors on Hold: Although major players like BlackRock and Fidelity attended the White House summit, they have made it clear that large-scale allocations will only happen after congressional legislation.

Weak Retail Confidence: The 2024 memecoin crash left retail investors with an average loss rate of 75%, reducing the share of high-risk capital in the market from 45% to 28%. This lack of speculative enthusiasm limits upward momentum.

On-Chain Data Evidence:

• Bitcoin exchange net inflows surged by 120% after the announcement, indicating increased selling pressure.
• SOL’s total value locked (TVL) dropped by 12% in one week, showing that capital is exiting high-risk assets at an accelerated pace.

3. Policy Implications

Another key factor in the market pullback was the response from the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department.

The day after Trump signed the executive order, Fed Chair Jerome Powell testified before Congress, stating:
“We still need to closely monitor the potential risks of crypto assets to the financial system.”

Similarly, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen emphasized that while the U.S. government has established a reserve, this does not mean that cryptocurrencies will be recognized as legal tender or integrated into the Federal Reserve system.

These cautious statements reinforced the market’s perception that the government has not fully embraced crypto but is instead adopting a controlled recognition approach — acknowledging its value while maintaining regulatory oversight.

Is the U.S. Crypto Strategic Reserve a Bullish or Bearish Signal?

Let’s take a look at how well-known figures in the crypto market perceive this matter:

• David Sacks: President Trump has promised to establish a strategic Bitcoin reserve and a digital asset repository. These commitments have now been fulfilled. This executive order underscores President Trump’s dedication to making the U.S. the “world’s crypto capital.” I want to thank the President for his leadership and vision in supporting this cutting-edge technology, as well as his swift execution in advancing the digital asset industry. His administration is truly moving at “tech speed.”
• Forbes journalist Eleanor Terrett posted on X, stating: The purpose of the reserve is to “responsibly manage the government’s digital assets under the leadership of @ USTreasury.”
• Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer at Bitwise, commented: In the long run, this is extremely beneficial for Bitcoin.

1）It significantly reduces the likelihood that the U.S. government will one day “ban” Bitcoin.

2）It greatly increases the chances that other countries will establish strategic Bitcoin reserves.

3）It accelerates the pace at which other nations consider setting up strategic Bitcoin reserves because it creates a short-term window for them to front-run the U.S.’s potential additional purchases.

4）It makes it harder for institutions — ranging from national account advisory platforms to quasi-governmental organizations like the International Monetary Fund — to portray Bitcoin as a dangerous or unsuitable asset to hold.

 

Some industry insiders believe that market reactions are not the most important factor. Instead, this move will trigger an arms race to acquire more Bitcoin — first in the U.S., then in other countries. In the long run, this is extremely beneficial. Keep accumulating and stay humble.

From a long-term perspective, this initiative by the U.S. government could provide the market with a more stable growth trajectory. Firstly, the government’s strategic reserves may signal a clearer regulatory framework for crypto assets in the future, reducing policy uncertainty and attracting more institutional investors. Secondly, the establishment of such reserves also lends a certain degree of credibility to Bitcoin and the broader crypto market, further solidifying its legitimacy on a global scale.

However, in the short term, the market still faces several challenges. Firstly, it remains uncertain whether the U.S. government will introduce more detailed reserve management guidelines, particularly regarding whether it will actively increase holdings or how it plans to handle existing reserves. Secondly, the extent to which other countries will follow the U.S. in establishing similar crypto strategic reserves will have a significant impact on the market. If other major economies, such as the European Union or China, adopt different regulatory approaches, the future trajectory of the global crypto market will become even more complex.

Overall, the establishment of a U.S. crypto strategic reserve is undoubtedly a major milestone in the history of crypto market development. However, its short-term impact remains uncertain. A market pullback does not necessarily indicate that this policy is bearish; rather, it may be a natural response as the market digests new information. As more details emerge and the policy framework becomes clearer, the long-term market outlook remains promising.